DAMIAN COMESANA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAMIAN COMESANA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
831 So. 2d 819
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So. 2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(evidentiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Comesana, 904 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…tnesses and Comesana and suggested that a “cover-up” had been perpetrated. Come-sana’s trial counsel did not object to these statements. Comesana was convicted of second degree murder, a conviction which we affirmed on appeal. See Comesana v. State, 831 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Comesana thereafter filed a 3.850 motion claiming, among other things, that Comesana’s trial lawyer, Robert Rudolph, was ineffective for failing to object to the following comments made by the State during closing argument4: Co…
Authorities Cited
- Czubak v. State, 570 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 1990)
- Phillips v. State, 739 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)