ERIC DWAYNE MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2002-12-12
No. 1D02-919
Barfield, J., Miner, J., Polston, J.
831 So. 2d 1237 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea because the trial court failed to advise the defendant of the mandatory minimum sentence required by the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute during the plea colloquy.


Holding

A plea is involuntary and must be withdrawn when the trial court fails to advise the defendant of a mandatory minimum sentence as a direct consequence of the plea.


Headnotes

[1] A mandatory minimum sentence is a direct consequence of a guilty plea that must be disclosed during the plea colloquy to ensure the plea is voluntary.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“For a plea to be voluntary, the defendant must be fully advised of the direct consequences of the plea.”

Establishing the standard for voluntary pleas under Florida law.

Facts & Procedural History

Moore entered a plea of nolo contendere to resisting an officer with violence and was sentenced as a Prison Releasee Reoffender under Florida Statutes…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant entered a plea of nolo contendré to resisting an officer with violence and was sentenced as a Prison Re-leasee Reoffender pursuant to section 775.082(9)(a), Florida Statutes (1999). We reverse the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f), because the minimum mandatory sentence required by the PRR statute was never discussed during the plea colloquy. For a plea to be voluntary, the defendant must be fully advised of the direct consequences of the plea. See State v. Green, 421 So. 2d 508, 509 (Fla.1982); Daniels v. State, 716 So. 2d 827, 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). A mandatory minimum sentence is a direct consequence of a defendant’s plea, and the failure to advise a defendant of this consequence renders a plea involuntary. See State v. Coban, 520 So. 2d 40, 42 (Fla.1988). In this case, the transcript of the plea discussions does not reveal any mention of a mandatory minimum sentence as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Thornton v. State, 747 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court, where appellant shall be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea. See Coban, 520 So. 2d at 41-42; Green, 421 So. 2d at 509-10.

BARFIELD, MINER and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw