E.O.R., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2002-12-18
No. 2D01-5568
ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.
831 So. 2d 1262 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

E.O.R., a juvenile, appeals his adjudication of guilt for interference with a school function and an indefinite probation sentence. The Florida appellate court affirms the adjudication but reverses the indefinite probation, holding that indefinite probation is only permissible when adjudication is withheld, and that a juvenile adjudicated for a second-degree misdemeanor can receive probation not exceeding six months.


Holding

An indefinite term of probation may only be imposed if adjudication is withheld. When a child is adjudicated guilty, probation for a second-degree misdemeanor may not exceed six months under Florida Statutes section 985.231(1)(a), which permits up to six months of supervision for misdemeanor-level offenses.


Headnotes

[1] An indefinite term of probation may only be imposed if adjudication is withheld.

[2] When a child is adjudicated guilty, the duration of supervision normally may not exceed the maximum term an adult could serve for the same offense.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“An indefinite term of probation may only be imposed if adjudication is withheld.”

Establishes the fundamental rule governing when indefinite probation is permissible in juvenile cases.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

E.O.R. was adjudicated guilty of interference with a school function, a second-degree misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced him to an indefinite term…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.

KELLY, Judge.

E.O.R. appeals from the order adjudicating him guilty of interference with a school function and placing him on probation. He argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred in sentencing him to an indefinite term of probation. He also argues that he could not be sentenced to more than sixty days, the maximum adult sentence for a second-degree misde meanor. We affirm E.O.R.’s adjudication of guilt, but reverse the imposition of an indefinite term of probation.

An indefinite term of probation may only be imposed if adjudication is withheld. S.R.A. v. State, 766 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that where adjudication is withheld, chapter 985 permits an indeterminate community control sentence until the child turns nineteen). If a child is adjudicated, normally the duration of his supervision may not exceed the maximum term that an adult may serve for the same offense. Id. at 279. Sixty days is the maximum term for an adult serving a sentence for a second-degree misdemeanor. § 775.082(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001). However, section 985.231(l)(a)(l.)(a.), Florida Statutes (2001),1 allows the court to sentence an adjudicated child to a maximum of six months of supervision for a second-degree misdemeanor. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court. If E.O.R. has not yet begun his probation pending appeal, the trial court must impose a definite term of probation, not exceeding six months. If E.O.R. has been under supervision for this offense from the time the sentence was imposed to the present, he is entitled to immediate termination of his supervision.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur. . Section 985.231(l)(a)(l.)(a.), Florida Statutes (2001), states in pertinent part:

If supervision or a program of community service is ordered by the court, the duration of such supervision or program must be consistent with any treatment and rehabilitation needs identified for the child and may not exceed the term for which sentence could be imposed if the child were committed for the offense, except that the duration of such supervision or program for an offense that is a misdemeanor of the second degree, or is equivalent to a misdemeanor of the second degree, may be for a period not to exceed 6 months.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw