VICTORIA MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND RSKCO., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2002-10-04
No. 1D01-1123
ERVIN, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
832 So. 2d 134 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a voluntary limitation of income does not bar entitlement to impairment income benefits under section 440.15(3)(a), Florida Statutes.


Facts & Procedural History

Victoria J. Moore appealed a workers' compensation order denying her claim for impairment benefits. The judge found she reached maximum medical improv…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Victoria J. Moore appeals a workers’ compensation order in which the judge denied her claim for impairment benefits. She contends that the judge erred in determining that she was not entitled to the benefits because she voluntarily limited her income. Under section 440.15(3)(a)3., Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), “[a]n employee’s entitlement to impairment income benefits begins the day after the employee reaches maximum medical improvement or the expiration of temporary benefits, whichever occurs earlier.... ” The judge found that the claimant reached MMI on November 30,1998, with an overall impairment rating of thirteen percent, and determined that she would be entitled to impairment benefits as of December 1, 1998, but for her voluntary limitation of income.

We agree the voluntary limitation of income does not bar entitlement to impairment income benefits under section 440.15(3)(a). Accordingly, the portion of the order denying impairment benefits is reversed, and the case is remanded.

We find no error as to any other points on appeal. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED.

ERVIN, WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw