RONALD G. BOGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONALD G. BOGAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
832 So. 2d 206
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Ronald Bogan appeals the summary denial of his motion to withdraw plea. In the motion, which was filed after sentencing, Bogan claimed that the plea was involuntary because he was coerced by trial counsel. However, he alleged no facts in support of his claim. On its face, the bare-bones motion was legally insufficient, and the trial court’s denial was proper. See Harris v. State, 818 So. 2d 567, 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); O’Fallon v. State, 239 So. 2d 872, 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). Therefore, we affirm the denial of relief.
Affirmed.
FULMER and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kerney v. State, 945 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…el stated that Kerney’s motion to withdraw was untimely filed. However, the motion was timely filed pursuant to the mailbox rule. . Kerney’s motion to withdraw the plea contained no facts in support of the claims raised therein. See Bogan v. State, 832 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that a rule 3.170(0 motion was properly summarily denied where the movant claimed that the plea was involuntarily entered because he was coerced by trial counsel but provided no facts in support of this claim). Furthermor…
Authorities Cited
- Harris v. State, 818 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- O'Fallon v. State, 239 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)