BANK OF ALACHUA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
O. S. AULICK AND A. B. C. GOODE, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
BANK OF ALACHUA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
O. S. AULICK AND A. B. C. GOODE, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
98 Fla. 426
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Century Tr. Co. of Baltimore v. The Allison Realty Co., 105 Fla. 456 (Fla. 1932)…uch question had been raised, we would feel constrained to hold that the buildings had not been completed and that work was in progress until such materials were furnished and such work was performed. ’ ’ See also Service Lumber Supply Co. vs. Cox, 98 Fla. 426, 123 So. 820. So it is in this case, if the labor upon or the furnishing of the material for the building was not finished prior to May 19,-1927, construction of such building was still in progress even though it may have been ‘substantially complet…1 / 2