RODNEY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RODNEY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
832 So. 2d 883
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation listing the conditions of probation violated, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
DAVIS, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ortiz v. State, 968 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…remand as to these three grounds only. On remand, the trial court may either grant an eviden-tiary hearing or again enter summary denial and attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Appellant’s allegations. See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 832 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions. WEBSTER, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.…
-
Wilson v. State, 871 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…sly challenged the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, and this Court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for further record attachments or for an evidentiary hearing. See Wilson v. State, 832 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). On remand, the trial court again summarily denied appellant’s motion and attached appellant’s judgment and sentence, criminal punishment code score-sheet, plea agreement, and plea colloquy in support of the denial. This appeal f…
-
McBRIDE v. State, 842 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…nditions of supervision Appellant violated, nor does the written order state the sentence imposed upon revocation. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See, e.g., Williams v. State, 832 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). AFFIRMED. BOOTH, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Oliver v. State, 819 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)