RONALD E. ROGERS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reinstatement Of Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
By amended petition, Ronald E. Rogers seeks a belated appeal of a judgment and sentence. Although a timely notice of appeal was originally filed and the appeal was docketed before this court as case number 1D01-3692, that appeal was dismissed when no response was received to the court’s order requiring payment.of the filing fee or the filing of an order of insolvency. We have therefore treated the amended petition as seeking reinstatement of the appeal in case number 1D01-3692, and in response to an order to show cause, the state indicates that it does not object to the granting of such relief. Accordingly, we grant the amended petition and reinstate petitioner’s appeal in case number 1D01-3692.1
AMENDED PETITION GRANTED.
WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur. . Petitioner has requested that this court appoint counsel for purposes of the appeal, but the proper forum for determining whether petitioner is entitled to the services of appointed counsel is the lower tribunal. By separate order issued in case number 1D01-3692, we have relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court to consider whether petitioner qualifies for the appointment of counsel.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ogilvie v. Ogilvie, 954 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…ment where "[a] court of this state or a court of the other state determines that the child [and], the child’s parents ... do not presently reside in the other state.” § 61.516(2), Fla. Stat. (2005)) (emphasis supplied). See also Morales v. Salazar, 833 So. 2d 226, 228 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (noting change in modification jurisdiction standard upon adoption of section 61.516, effective October 1, 2002). . Once the burden of showing a substantial, material change has been met, the second part of the modific…
-
Thornburg v. Donovan, 866 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…forum for modification of child custody is a question of subject matter jurisdiction, not personal jurisdiction or venue, and subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, nor created, by consent or agreement of the parties. See Morales v. Salazar, 833 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).1 [*179] Petition for writ of prohibition GRANTED as to all issues related to the custody of the younger son.2 SAWAYA, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur. . Having found that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be created by consent…
-
D.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 888 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…diction. We agree. Subject matter jurisdiction of these proceedings, which were filed before October 1, 2002, is governed by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UC-CJA), sections 61.1302-61.1348, Florida Statutes (2001). Morales v. Salazar, 833 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Under the UCCJA, Connecticut was clearly the home state at the time the lower courts jurisdiction was initially invoked. DCF concedes this point but argues that Florida became the home state before the termination proceedings we…