JOSE MIGUEL SALDANE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE MIGUEL SALDANE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
833 So. 2d 264
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650, 664 (Fla.2000); Williams v. State, 673 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tannehill v. State, 843 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…raised in a rule 3.850 motion). Additionally, we find that Appellant’s second and third claims, that his habitual offender sentence is an unlawful departure sentence that cannot be imposed without written reasons, are meritless. See Viera v. State, 833 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (confirming that habitual offender sentences are not subject to sentencing guidelines and thus are not departure sentences that must be accompanied by written reasons). We also advise Appellant that additional, repetitive, non-m…
-
Curry v. State, 913 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Burgal v. State, 888 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Viera v. State, 833 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).…
Authorities Cited
- Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 2000)
- Williams v. State, 673 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)