WALTER ARMISTEAD, JOLENE ARMISTEAD, SEA PLACE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ISLAND PALMS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,
v.
GENE D. BROWN, G. BROWN & COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND MARILYN B. BROWN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE BROWN FAMILY TRUST, RESPONDENTS
WALTER ARMISTEAD, JOLENE ARMISTEAD, SEA PLACE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ISLAND PALMS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS,
GENE D. BROWN, G. BROWN & COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND MARILYN B. BROWN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE BROWN FAMILY TRUST, RESPONDENTS
833 So. 2d 302
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. Young v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 825 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
ALLEN, C.J., BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boyington v. State, 125 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…laims raised in a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.” Id. Accordingly, Petitioner has demonstrated appellate counsel was ineffective on this claim. See Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650, 660 (Fla.2000); Cupon v. State, 833 So. 2d 302, 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Consistent with the State’s recommendation, the petition is granted in part and remanded to the lower court to strike the lump sum costs and fines from Petitioner’s sentence. However, we reverse without prejudice to the tri…
-
Molina v. State, 150 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…o a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel raised in a habeas petition mirrors the standard for trial counsel ineffectiveness established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Cupon v. State, 833 So. 2d 302, 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). In order to grant Molina habeas relief on these grounds, this Court must apply a two-prong analysis: First, the petitioner must show that the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute serious error or a subs…
-
Ladaniel LEE v. State, 115 So. 3d 1119 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…meritorious, preserved argument as to which we granted his codefendant relief in Collier v. State, — So. 3d - (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). In this case, the failure to raise the issue meets the deficiency prong of the Strickland test. See Cupon v. State, 833 So. 2d 302, 304-05 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Further, the Collier opinion establishes that the result of Lee’s appeal would have been different if the issue had been raised. The fairness and correctness of Lee’s direct appeal has thus been undermined, such that he…
Authorities Cited
- Young v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 825 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)