CARLOS A. MILLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARLOS A. MILLAN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
833 So. 2d 793
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Bertolotti v. State, 565 So. 2d 1343 (Fla.1990); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129(Fla.1986); Thomas v. State, 326 So. 2d 413 (Fla.1975); Mendez v. State, 747 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also § 90.803(23), Fla. Stat. (1999).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Randall v. Randall, 930 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…der granting appellate fees) (“Respondent’s motion for appellate attorneys’ fees is provisionally granted and remanded to the trial court to fix amount conditioned on a finding of the wife’s need and the husband’s ability to pay.”); Young v. Hector, 833 So. 2d 793, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“As to [the former husband’s] motion for appellate attorney’s fees, we remanded to the trial court. If [he] establishes his entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen ..., the trial court is authorize…
-
Blakely v. Blakely, 123 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…at it is merely an order regarding an educational decision for the child. We find support in the trial court’s own statement that its ruling was limited to what school the child would attend for his freshman year of high school. See Young v. Hector, 833 So. 2d 793, 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a court’s decision to allow a child to attend an out-of-state boarding school was not a relocation, but an educational decision). Thus, the order is not one of the appeal-able non-final orders found in Florida R…
Authorities Cited
- State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)
- Thomas v. State, 326 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 1975)
- Bertolotti v. State, 565 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 1990)
- Marina Funding Grp., Inc. v. PS Marinas 3, 747 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- Mendez v. State, 747 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)