R.W. SMITH & CO. OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
R. WILBUR SMITH & CO., INC. D/B/A R.W. SMITH & CO., INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-11-06
No. 3D01-1531
Before COPE, LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ.
833 So. 2d 806 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Caution
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

R.W. Smith & Co. of Florida, Inc., appeals an adverse summary judgment in its suit against R. Wilbur Smith & Co., Inc. We agree with the trial court that the instant suit is barred by res judicata. See Red Carpet Corp. of Panama City Beach v. Roberts, 443 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Harrington v. Batchelor, 781 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

R. Wilbur Smith & Co., Inc. appeals an order denying its motion to tax costs against Antonio Elortegui, the president and sole shareholder of R.W. Smith & Co. of Florida. We reverse on authority of subsection 607.1421(4), Florida Statutes (2001), and Barrie v. Buchsbaum, 547 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bankatlantic v. Berliner, 912 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …as a release of Berliner. Berliner counters that once BankAtlantic filed the satisfaction of judgment and released 24 Hour and Fareri, the release constituted a release of Berliner since he was a guarantor. See Amerishop Mayfair, L.P. v. Billante, 833 So. 2d 806, 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“The law is settled that the release of the debtor constitutes a release of the guarantor; [t]his is because where the debtor has been released, there is nothing left for the guarantor to secure.”); Ulrich v. Ulrich, 603 So.…
  • …r of the lease term, and retain those rental proceeds as well”). Finally, since the amount of damages owed by Rodberg is dependent on those owed by Bucky’s, the final judgment must also be reversed as to him. See Amerishop Mayfair, L.P. v. Billante, 833 So. 2d 806, 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“A contract of guaranty is the promise to answer for the payment of the debt, default or performance of another.”). The motion for summary judgment did, however, establish that Bucky’s breached the lease. Thus, we reverse f…
  • …e Corp. v. McIver, 875 So. 2d 375, 381 (Fla. 2004). "A guaranty is a collateral promise to answer for the debt or obligation of another.” FDIC v. Univ. Anclote, Inc., 764 F.2d 804, 806 (11th Cir. 1985); see also Amerishop Mayfair, L.P. v. Billante, 833 So. 2d 806, 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“A contract of guaranty is the promise to answer for the payment of the debt, default or performance of another.”). “The same elements required to prove a breach of contract claim must be established to successfully allege a…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw