EDITH RIVERA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2003-01-02
No. 4D01-4201
WARNER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ„ concur.
833 So. 2d 870 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii); Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979).

WARNER, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tucker v. State, 873 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
    …mbers were never included in any of the affidavits and amended affidavits of violation of probation, nor the warrants, that led to the revocation of her community supervision in the other cases. The State concedes this fact. See Jean-Marie v. State, 833 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse Tucker’s judgments and sentences in case numbers 98-7951 and 00-976. As the State points out, “[u]pon remand, the trial court may reconsider entering revocation if the State files the proper affidavit and…
  • Nelson v. State, 16 So. 3d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …on in the three cases for which no affidavit of violation of probation was filed. It is fundamental error to revoke probation in a case when the State fails to allege a violation of probation for that particular case number. See Jean-Marie v. State, 833 So. 2d 870, 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In Jean-Marie, the trial court revoked probation in two cases although the affidavit of violation listed only one case number. The Fourth District held “that it was fundamental error to revoke probation in case number 99-8…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw