PHOEBE WENNESHEIMER, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN WENNESHEIMER, APPELLEE
PHOEBE WENNESHEIMER, APPELLANT,
JOHN WENNESHEIMER, APPELLEE
98 Fla. 523
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript-of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it .is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby-affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.'
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. Dean, 133 Fla. 47 (Fla. 1938)…is Chapter covers the situation where A utters B’s worthless check to a third party. Knowledge that the drawer has insufficient funds on deposit is an essential element of the offense and must be alleged in the warrant. The case of Dowling v. State, 98 Fla. 523, 124 So. 12, is illustrative of a case arising under this Section (Compiled General Laws of 1927, Section 7923). In this [*53] case it was held that the warrant, substantially in the form set out in Section 7, as above quoted, was insufficient to ch…
-
Roberts v. Dean, 136 Fla. 421 (Fla. 1935)…is Chapter covers the situation where A utters B’s worthless check to a third party. Knowledge that the drawer has insufficient funds on deposit is an essential element of the offense and must be alleged in the warrant. The case of Dowling v. State, 98 Fla. 523, 124 So. 12 is illustrative of a case arising under this Section (Compiled General Laws of 1927, Section 7923). In this case it was held that the warrant, substantially in the form set out in Section 7, as above quoted, was insufficient to charge a…
-
Hiram M. Farnham v. Caldwell, 141 Fla. 416 (Fla. 1940)…So. 768; First Nat. Bank v. Gibbs, 78 Fla. 118, 82 So. 618; Jacksonville, etc., Ry. Co. v. Boy, 34 Fla. 389, 16 So. 290; Hunt v. Jacksonville, 34 Fla. 504, 16 So. 398, 43 Am. St. Rep. 214; [*418] Rifas v. Gross (Fla.) 143 So. 600; Dowling v. State, 98 Fla. 523, 124 So. 12. “In this State the writ of certiorari is used to quash illegal judgments, not to assume and complete the adjudication of a cause.” First Nat. Bank v. Gibbs, 78 Fla. 118, 82 So. 618, quoted in Rifas v. Gross (Fla.) 143 So. 600. Review…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence