ROBERT J. MATISKO, APPELLANT,
v.
WANDA E. MATISKO, APPELLEE
ROBERT J. MATISKO, APPELLANT,
WANDA E. MATISKO, APPELLEE
834 So. 2d 405
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted.
SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reed v. Reed, 857 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…ad faith practices.” The trial court failed to rule on this issue and former wife did not seek a ruling on motion for rehearing. Without a ruling, it is unclear whether the trial court granted or denied former wife’s request. Cf. Matisko v. Matisko, 834 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)(finding that party’s failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precluded consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted). On remand, the trial court shall make a ruling on former wife’s reques…