JOHN BELCHER AND LEESA BELCHER, PETITIONERS,
v.
PATRICIA JOHNSON, AS GUARDIAN OF HARRIET L. ROBERTS, A/K/A HENRIETTA L. ROBERTS, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court quashed a protective order preventing deposition of an incapacitated elderly woman, holding that incapacity for guardianship purposes does not automatically disqualify a witness from testifying, and remanded for a hearing under Florida Statute § 90.603 to determine actual competency.
Incapacity for guardianship purposes does not automatically disqualify a witness from testifying; a trial court must conduct a hearing under § 90.603 to determine actual witness competency.
[1] A person adjudicated incapacitated for guardianship purposes is not automatically disqualified from testifying as a witness; witness competency must be determined under F…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under the established law, even a person who has been declared insane can be found competent to testify.”
Court explaining that incapacity for guardianship does not automatically disqualify a witness from testifying.
John and Leesa Belcher sought to depose Harriet L. Roberts, an elderly woman with dementia, and her guardian Patricia Johnson filed a motion for prote…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Witness Competency cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
John and Leesa Belcher petition this court for a writ of certiorari to quash a protective order. The Belchers sought to take the deposition of Harriet L. Roberts, who is an elderly woman suffering from a level of dementia. Her guardian, Patricia Johnson, filed a motion for protective order seeking to prevent the deposition because Ms. Roberts is, to some degree, legally incapacitated. The trial court granted the protective order without an evidentiary hearing and without making a factual determination that Ms. Roberts should be disqualified to testify as a witness under section 90.603, Florida Statutes (2000). Apparently, the trial court assumed that Ms. Roberts’ incapacity for purposes of a guardianship proceeding rendered her disqualified to testify as a matter of law. Florida law, however, only disqualifies a witness under specific circumstances. See § 90.603. Under the established law, even a person who has been declared insane can be found competent to testify. See Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Robinson, 68 So. 2d 406, 413 (Fla.1953).
Although an order denying discovery may rarely qualify for review by certiorari, we conclude that Ms. Roberts’ advanced age and deteriorating mental status render this a case in which review on appeal cannot provide an adequate remedy. Accordingly, we quash the protective order and remand to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether Ms. Roberts should be disqualified from testifying pursuant to section 90.603.
Petition for writ of certiorari granted.
ALTENBERND, SALCINES, and' STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hayward v. State, 183 So. 3d 286 (Fla. 2015)…ever, that aspect of McDowell’s testimony never wavered. Although McDowell was older, in poor health, and possibly confused about some aspects of the event he witnessed, that does not provide a basis to disqualify him. See, e.g., Belcher v. Johnson, 834 So. 2d 422, 422-23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (holding that an elderly woman with dementia is not disqualified as a witness simply for those reasons). Even insanity of a witness has been found to affect only the witness’s credibility, not their competence to testify,…
-
Scolaro v. M. Ashley Butler, PH.D., 135 So. 3d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…xpressing himself or incapable of understanding the duty to tell the truth. § 90.603, Fla. Stat. (2011). In order to avoid discovery, Scolaro will be required to have an examination to determine if he is competent to testify. See Belcher v. Johnson, 834 So. 2d 422, 422 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (quashing a protective order and remanding to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether a deponent suffering from dementia should be disqualified from testifying). At best, the petitioners’ argument amounts to…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Robinson, 68 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1953)