DALE CROCKETT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Harris, 881 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 2004)
  …8, - So. 2d -, 2003 WL 21939030 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 14, 2003); Ritchie v. State, 842 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Viruet v. State, 847 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Meadows v. State, 839 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 4th [*1085] DCA 2003); Crockett v. State, 834 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). . We accept the State’s representation that Harris is serving the probationary portion of his sentence while civilly committed. We therefore do not address whether the State would violate his plea agreement if his probation did…
• Smith v. Smith, 927 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …cation of custody, and res judicata. DUE PROCESS The Former Wife correctly argues that the order requiring her to relocate back to Manatee County from Dade County violated her right to due process of law. This court recognized in Sabine v. Sabine, 834 So. 2d 959, 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), that when “a judgment is not based on an issue that had been framed by the pleadings, noticed for hearing, or litigated by the parties, it may not stand” because “[t]he failure to follow these basic procedural requirements i…
• Randall v. Randall, 948 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …he amended final judgment was entered permitting her to reject any offer under $375,000 (and not because Mr. Randall destroyed this asset) is, therefore, reversed. See Smith v. Smith, 927 So. 2d 118, 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (quoting Sabine v. Sabine, 834 So. 2d 959, 960 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), “when ‘a judgment is not based on an issue that had been framed by the pleadings, noticed for hearing, or litigated by the parties, it may not stand’ because ‘[t]he failure to follow these basic procedural requirements impli…

Authorities Cited

• Murray v. Regier, 872 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2002)