MAURICIO SOLORZANO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that evidentiary rulings were not preserved and that there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions.
Appellant was convicted of crimes and appealed, challenging evidentiary rulings and the denial of motions for judgment of acquittal.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judgment Of Acquittal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, defendant below, appeals his convictions claiming first, that the trial court abused its discretion in certain evidentiary rulings, and second, that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.
The evidentiary rulings at issue, were not properly preserved for our review. See Correll v. State, 523 So. 2d 562 (Fla.1988) (even when prior motion in limine has been denied, failure to object at time evidence introduced waives issue for appellate review). Even if they had been preserved, we find no error in the trial court’s rulings. See Griffin v. State, 639 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla.1994); Gorham v. State, 454 So. 2d 556 (Fla.1984). See also Osborne v. State, 743 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Appellant also contends his motions for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. We disagree, finding that there was legally sufficient evidence on which to base verdicts of guilt in this case. See Crump v. State, 622 So. 2d 963, 971 (Fla.1993); Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla.1981).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Delbert Lee Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1981)
- Griffin v. State, 639 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1994)
- Correll v. State, 523 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1988)
- Crump v. State, 622 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1993)
- Gorham v. State, 454 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1984)
- Lavincent Osborne v. State, 743 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)