PEARL M. LANGFIELD, A WIDOW, ALSO KNOWN AS PEARL LANGFIELD; HULDA MAYHEW, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, JOHN F. MAYHEW, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUIT, AND JOHN F. MAYHEW, APPELLANTS,
v.
SAMUEL E. COZINE, SR., APPELLEE
PEARL M. LANGFIELD, A WIDOW, ALSO KNOWN AS PEARL LANGFIELD; HULDA MAYHEW, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, JOHN F. MAYHEW, FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SUIT, AND JOHN F. MAYHEW, APPELLANTS,
SAMUEL E. COZINE, SR., APPELLEE
98 Fla. 564
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The motion to quash the appeal herein is granted on the authority of the opinion in the case of Randall v. Twitchell, decided at this term.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lane v. State, 154 Fla. 853 (Fla. 1944)…y Title & Trust Co., et al., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 283, and in Holland v. Webster, 43 Fla. 85, 29 So. 625; Crump v. Snively-Giddings Const. Co., 99 Fla. 368, 126 So. 291; Randall v. Twitchell, 98 Fla. 559, 124 So. 21, followed in Langfield v. Cozine, 98 Fla. 564, 124 So. 23, 98 Fla. 565, 124 So. 23; Anderson v. Hardesty, 99 Fla. 1347, 128 So. 851; Walker v. American Agr. Chemical Co., 83 Fla. 153, 90 So. 696; Broward v. Bowden, 39 Fla. 751, 22 So. 489; Barrs v. Peacock, 65 Fla. 12, 61 So. 118; DuBose v. Mei…