JAMES A. JERRELLS AND SHARLENE R. JERRELLS, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORIDA 12 INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
JAMES A. JERRELLS AND SHARLENE R. JERRELLS, APPELLANTS,
FLORIDA 12 INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
835 So. 2d 1263
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order on appeal is a nonfinal, non-appealable order. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. 9.130.
ALLEN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
G.F. v. State, 927 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…a Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) was amended to provide the same procedural safeguards as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). G.F.'s utilization of rule 8.135(b)(2) preserved his arguments for appellate review. See N.W. v. State, 835 So. 2d 1263, 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).…
-
D.B. v. State, 923 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…ing the recommendation in the context of the child’s needs or explain why its consideration of the same factors relied upon by the Department led to a different conclusion. See A.C.N. v. State, 727 So. 2d 368, 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); N.W. v. State, 835 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); N.B. v. State, 911 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Instead, the trial court merely restated the facts of the case as support for its decision. Such reasons are legally insufficient. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s dispos…