M. C. FOWLER, A FREE DEALER, C. R. WILLIAMS AND J. M. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
GEORGE R. SIMS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
M. C. FOWLER, A FREE DEALER, C. R. WILLIAMS AND J. M. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
GEORGE R. SIMS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
98 Fla. 612
Florida Supreme Court (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to thé Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen ánd inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Parks, 115 Fla. 608 (Fla. 1934)…r three defendants. The motion for new trial was' granted and appealed from by means of writ of error taken to the order granting a new trial as specially authorized by our statutes. The order granting the new trial was affirmed. See Fowler v. Sims, 98 Fla. 612, 124 Sou. Rep. 59. After the going down of the mandate a plea to the jurisdiction was filed in the court below by .the defendants Fowler, Williams and Mitchell. This plea set up that because final judgment had been duly entered against the Anclote…