RICARDO SANTIAGO GENDE, APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (89 total)

• Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004)
  …section 6. Relying on Taylor, Franklin filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to [*1069] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). The trial court granted the motion and the State appealed to the Third District. In State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), the Third District held that the Act did not violate the constitutional requirement of a single subject. The Third District also certified conflict with Taylor on whether the Act violates the single subject requirement. III. DIS…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …nt felony offenders. The provisions contained in an act must be “fairly and naturally germane to or reasonably connected” with the subject of the act. See State v. Reedy Creek Improvement Dist., 216 So. 2d 202, 206 (Fla.1968). In State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So. 2d 659 (Fla.2003), the Third District found that Chapter 99-188 did not violate the single subject requirement as all the sections of the Act were sufficiently related to the purpose of the Act “to protect…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Exposito v. State, 891 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 2004)
  …ed a State appeal from a post-trial order reducing Exposito’s conviction to a lesser-included offense. See 854 So. 2d at 675. The Third District certified conflict with Richars. See id. Additionally, in accord with its decision in State v. Franklin, 836 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), approved, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004), holding chapter 99-188 constitutional, the Third District reinstated Exposito’s charge and conviction. See id. ANALYSIS The State’s right to appeal in a criminal case must be “expressly co…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)