JAMES MICHAEL WARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appeal Period cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated December 31, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed on October 9, 2002, appealing the Final Judgment and Order of Commitment, entered on July 23, 2002, is untimely. The jury verdict was dated July 18, 2002. Therefore the Motion for New Trial which was served on August 1, 2002, was untimely because it was served more than ten days after the jury verdict was entered. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b). Accordingly, the Motion for New Trial did not delay the rendition of the Final Judgment and Order of Commitment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the order, this Court is without appellate jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App.9.110(b).
DISMISSED.
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Reid Alexander Cocalis, 959 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 2007)…or past medical expenses, but no damages for future medical expenses. On appeal, the Fourth District reversed, finding the trial court had abused its discretion in admitting Dr. Unis’s medical chart with the unfavorable notation. Bradley v. Brotman, 836 So. 2d 1129, 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). The Fourth District opinion also commented on Cocalis’s lack of professionalism in the underlying proceedings, stating, “[W]e condemn the actions of defense counsel as to both the contact with Dr. Bernhardt and the strateg…
-
Andreaus v. Impact Pest Mgmt., Inc., 157 So. 3d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…e at all that a puddle of water could have caused the fall. The failure to redact these references was a clerical error that could have easily been corrected before the jury’s mind was tainted by the inadmissible references. See Bradley v. Brotman, 836 So. 2d 1129, 1133, 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (determining that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to excise an. improperly admitted note from evidence before the note was revealed to the jury: “the court could have easily prevented the prejudice a…
-
Shorter v. State, 98 So. 3d 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…tworthiness of the evidence, the records must still withstand the test of relevancy. Accordingly, a trial judge may exclude the records if they are unfairly prejudicial or confusing.”) (citing [*692] § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (1991)); Bradley v. Brotman, 836 So. 2d 1129, 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Even if the medical record satisfied the business record exception, the opinion still may be excluded if it is unfairly prejudicial or confusing under section 90.403, Florida Statutes. This prejudice or confusion is more…