CFI SALES & MARKETING, LTD., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA MARLINS BASEBALL, LTD., APPELLEE
CFI SALES & MARKETING, LTD., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA MARLINS BASEBALL, LTD., APPELLEE
837 So. 2d 423
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal of a final judgment in a contract action, we find no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary challenges brought. Moreover, we conclude that the record contains substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we accordingly affirm as to the other issues without discussion. See Adkins v. Adkins, 650 So. 2d 61, 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (stating that: “so long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, we are required to affirm the final judgment appealed from James Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“where there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s conclusions, reviewing court must affirm”).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mitchell v. Ervin Higgs, 61 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…ndings are based on substantial and competent evidence, we affirm the final judgment regarding Mitchell’s lack of qualification for the homestead exemption on the Key West property for 2007. CFI Sales & Mktg., Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd., 837 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Analysis — 1999-2006 Tax Years (Case No. 3D09-1924) The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of Mitchell regarding the property appraiser’s revocation of Mitchell’s homestead exemption for years 1999 through 20…
-
McCORMICK v. COX, 118 So. 3d 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…iciaries introduced competent substantial evidence of breaches of fiduciary duty by McCormick, McCormick IV, and MM&M, and resulting damage, thus entitling them to an affirmance on those claims. CFI Sales & Mktg. Ltd. v. Fla. Marlins Baseball, Ltd., 837 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). The beneficiaries called an experienced trust and probate attorney regarding the trustee’s duty to diligently ascertain the value of the sole asset of the trusts, the Lynnfield property. That witness also opined that it would be…
-
Fernandez v. The City OF Miami, 147 So. 3d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…unds of ambiguity and prior superseding breach. The trial court’s conclusions on breach of fiduciary duty and fraud must be affirmed. Mitchell v. Higgs, 61 So. 3d 1152, 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); CFI Sales & Mktg., Ltd. v. Fla. Marlins Baseball, Ltd., 837 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). III. Conclusion The trial court heard and considered extensive evidence proving breaches of two separate duties, each of which is imbued with far more than a garden variety, arms’-length employer-employee relationship in the pr…
Authorities Cited
- Adkins v. Adkins, 650 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)