WINSTON PITTS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
WINSTON PITTS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
837 So. 2d 518
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Winston Pitts filed a motion in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion as untimely. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Davis v. State, 745 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
BOOTH, WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Staveley v. State, 866 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…h DCA 2003); McDonald v. State, 840 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Adams v. State, 800 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). . See Ward v. State, 854 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Haber v. State, 849 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 20Ó3); Pitts v. State, 837 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Lancaster v. State, 821 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).…
-
Tedesco v. State, 893 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…ount I (the defendant having fully served his sentence on Count II). The state concedes, and we agree, that the scrivener’s error appearing on the sentencing form should be corrected by the trial court on remand to reflect this. See Chavez v. State, 837 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2003). FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Davis v. State, 745 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)