A.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
A.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
837 So. 2d 570
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s restitution order. However, we modify that portion of the order that required appellant to begin paying restitution on March 15, 2002, at a time when appellant was committed to a level six program. We modify that portion of the restitution order to provide that appellant shall begin paying restitution at a rate of $30 per month upon securing employment and that he shall make every reasonable effort to secure employment upon release from the level six program. See In re B.S., 616 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. State, 33 So. 3d 747 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…he remaining violation. We thus reverse the order ap [*749] pealed and remand this case so that the trial court may reconsider the matter. See, e.g., Ubiles, 23 So. 3d at 1292; Glover v. State, 17 So. 3d 886, 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Foggy v. State, 837 So. 2d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We remind the trial court that a written order of revocation, specifying the conditions violated, is required. See, e.g., Moncrieffe v. State, 17 So. 3d 850, 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Reversed and Remanded. WARNER and POLE…
Authorities Cited
- van Tassell v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Rimmer v. State, 601 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Ozzie Washington, Jr. v. State, 616 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- In the Interest of B.S., 616 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)