ARNOLDO GUTIERREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
ARNOLDO GUTIERREZ, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
837 So. 2d 609
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the claimant’s appeal to the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission was untimely and he did not allege that the referee’s decision was not timely mailed, we affirm. See § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (2001); Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc., 807 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cabanela v. State, 871 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…four convictions violated double jeopardy where they all arose from one criminal episode. We affirmed his sentence without prejudice to his right to seek post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Cabanela v. State, 837 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Thereafter, Cabanela moved for Rule 3.850 relief in the trial court, arguing that he committed one ongoing sexual assault against the victim on August 1, 1996. Thus, he argued, the multiple convictions and sentences imposed agai…
-
Lopez v. Am. Airlines & Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 876 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…nemployment Appeals Comm’n, 842 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Here, however, Mr. Lopez does not assert that he never received the referee’s decision or that he received it too late to file a timely appeal. See Gutierrez v. Fla. Unemployment Comp., 837 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Accordingly, the order is affirmed. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc., 807 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)