MICHAELA MILLER, RICHARD STOLPMAN, AND RAMON MATOS, APPELLANTS,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, APPELLEE
MICHAELA MILLER, RICHARD STOLPMAN, AND RAMON MATOS, APPELLANTS,
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, APPELLEE
837 So. 2d 1120
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Bellinger v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 2002 WL 533403 (Ohio App. 9 Dist.2002), appeal denied, 96 Ohio St.3d 1492, 774 N.E. 2d 766 (2002); Andre Stris-hak & Assoc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 300 A.D.2d 608, 752 N.Y.S.2d 400 (2002).
GROSS, MAY, JJ„ and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Judkins v. State, 84 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…coverage ... and any noncovered medical, dental, and prescription medication expenses of the child, shall be added to the basic obligation unless these expenses have been ordered to be separately paid on a percentage basis.” See also Clark v. Clark, 837 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the lower tribunal to provide for an award of the child’s future uncovered medical expenses in accordance with the father’s percentage share of child support. In addition, the Depar…