A. WAYNE LACKEY, APPELLANT,
v.
SHEILA FRANKLIN, APPELLEE
A. WAYNE LACKEY, APPELLANT,
SHEILA FRANKLIN, APPELLEE
837 So. 2d 1127
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).
FARMER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jenkins v. UBN Global Trading Corp. & Smorgasbord Mgmt. Co., 886 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…dollars).” For the reasons that follow, this order must be reversed. First, the only receipt in the record indicates the fee amounted to $262, not $616. Second, there is no finding that the fee was reasonable. See Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Carnoto, 837 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Third, the fee is a cost to be assessed against the party, not counsel. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-1.8(e). If the court intended the fee to be a sanction against the lawyer, then it was required to make specific factual findin…