FLORIDA MOTOR LINES, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
B. F. CASAD, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1929-10-18
Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur., Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford', J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
98 Fla. 726 Florida Supreme Court (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This case was tried at the same time and upon the same evidence as the case of Florida Motor Lines, Inc., v. Ralph N. Casad by his next friend and father B. F. Casad, the judgment in which has this day been affirmed. This case was brought to recover for damages to the automobile which at the time of the collision was being driven by Ralph N. Casad with the consent of his father, B. F. Casad. The judgment in this case will be affirmed for like reasons to those set forth in the opinion in the companion case above mentioned.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford', J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 116 Fla. 390 (Fla. 1934)
    …rms of the bonds and of the mortgage given to secure them, which bonds provided that the trust deed was made a part of each bond, and the trust deed expressly authorized the trustee to foreclose in case of default. Winer v. Trust Company of Florida, 98 Fla. 726, 124 So, 35. Nor are any of the parties to this case in a position to question the capacity of the Marion Mortgage Company to act as' mortgage trustee under the trust deed executed by the Cortez Hotel Company, nor its corporate capacity to foreclose…
  • Brown v. Marion Mortg. Co., 107 Fla. 727 (Fla. 1932)
    …thirty days default the maturity may be accelerated and the mortgage foreclosed either by the election of a majority in amount of the bondholders, or by the election of the Trustee acting for all the bondholders. Winer vs. Trust Company of Florida, 98 Fla. 726, 124 So. 35. It is also contended by the defendants that since the pro [*736] vision in the bonds making the mortgage a part of the bonds renders the bonds non-negotiable and since negotiability is a most desirable attribute of a bond a Court of Eq…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw