JEAN-PAUL TRUJILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JEAN-PAUL TRUJILLO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
838 So. 2d 620
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Rolling v. State, 825 So. 2d 293 (Fla.2002); Penn v. State, 825 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
SHARP, W., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Akers v. State, 890 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…We are aware of decisions that hold the harmless error analysis applies to in [*1260] stances where a defendant was not given timely notice pursuant to section 775.084(3)(a)2. See Massey v. State, 609 So. 2d 598 (Fla.1992); Cruz Bertances v. State, 838 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (holding that failure to serve written notice is subject to harmless error analysis.) The State seeks to have the harmless error analysis applied in this case, pointing out that several months before Akers entered his plea, Akers…
Authorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)
- Rolling v. State, 825 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 2002)
- Penn v. State, 825 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)