SCOTT LEWIS MILLER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Lindsay v. State, 1 So. 3d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
  …Bundrage v. State, 814 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (recognizing that even overwhelming evidence cannot excuse the lack of a jury finding on the question of possession of a firearm for purposes of the 10/20/Life statute); see also Miller v. State, 838 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Bundrage and reversing the imposition of appellant’s minimum mandatory); Thompson v. State, 862 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversing the imposition of appellant’s minimum mandatory because “[t]he special verdict form—…
• Palanski Swain v. State, 226 So. 3d 1002 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
  …convic [*1004] tion for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; however, actual possession is required in,order to sentences defendant to a mandatory minimum sentence under the enhancement provision in section 775.087(2)(a)1. Miller v. State, 838 So. 2d 644, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Johnson v. State, 855 So. 2d 218, 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Bundrage v. State, 814 So. 2d 1133, 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). “Actual possession means: 1) the object is in the hand of or on the person;' or 2) the object-is in a c…
• Christian v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)
  …clear that a finding of actual possession is necessary to support imposition of the three-year mandatory minimum enhancement under section 775.087(2)(a)(1). Swain v. State, 226 So. 3d 1002, 1003-04 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (first citing Miller v. State, 838 So. 2d 644, 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); then citing Johnson v. State, 855 So. 2d 218, 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); and then citing Bundrage v. State, 814 So. 2d 1133, 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)). It is equally clear that the actual possession finding for purposes of se…

Authorities Cited

• Bundrage v. State, 814 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)