ROBERT SWEDLOW, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY ANN SWEDLOW, N/K/A MARY ANN D'AQUINO, APPELLEE
ROBERT SWEDLOW, APPELLANT,
MARY ANN SWEDLOW, N/K/A MARY ANN D'AQUINO, APPELLEE
840 So. 2d 372
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court’s determination that the husband’s disability policy was a marital asset subject to equitable distribution. See Hoffner v. Hoffner, 577 So. 2d 703, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Hanks v. Hanks, 553 So. 2d 340, 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Bloch v. Bloch, 688 So. 2d 945, 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). We affirm on all other issues. On remand, the sole issue for the circuit court is to increase the award of permanent alimony to the wife in light of the reclassification of the husband’s disability policy.
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tonya Banks v. Allegiant Security/ Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 122 So. 3d 983 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…also, Houck v. Lee County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 995 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding reversal and remand to be appropriate where JCC applied incorrect standard to permanent total disability claim); Cromartie v. City of St. Petersburg, 840 So. 2d 372, 373 (holding failure to apply correct legal principle, or provide sufficient basis to determine whether appropriate legal principles have been followed, is ground for reversal). In light of findings in the final compensation order, as well as the r…
-
Vill. OF N. Palm Beach & Emp'rs Mut., Inc. v. McKALE, 911 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…ne of the prohibited acts by a preponderance of the evidence. Singletary v. Yoder’s Ameritrust Ins. Corp., 871 So. 2d 289, 291(Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Failure to use the proper legal standard is grounds for reversal. Cromartie v. City of St. Petersburg, 840 So. 2d 372, 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We note that the JCC does not need to determine whether Claimant was employed or received payment for work while he was receiving benefits. The JCC is only required to determine whether Claimant knowingly or intentionally…
-
Lane v. Workforce Bus. Servs., Inc., 151 So. 3d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…l standard is grounds for reversal. Village of N. Palm Beach v. McKale, 911 So. 2d 1282, 1283 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (reversing a finding of compensability where JCC applied incorrect evidentiary standard); see also Cromartie v. City of St. Petersburg, 840 So. 2d 372, 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (reversing and remanding denial of com-pensability of psychiatric injury where it was unclear whether JCC applied correct standard of causation). Here, the JCC implied that the cost of videotaping the depositions was not rei…
Authorities Cited
- Gussie Hanks v. Hanks, 553 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Hoffner v. Hoffner, 577 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Bloch v. Bloch, 688 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)