WILLIAM J. REEDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2003-03-21
No. 1D02-2445
VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ„ and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.
840 So. 2d 437 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a sentence of seventy-five months in the Department of Corrections imposed after he was re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). Appellant claims the trial judge erred in re-sentencing him without the assistance of appointed counsel. We agree. When a defendant is re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, a de novo hearing is required. The defendant is entitled to be present at the hearing and to receive the assistance of counsel. Jenkins v. State, 816 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (ruling that in re-sentencing proceedings, such as the one here, the defendant is entitled to a de novo hearing and the assistance of counsel).

Accordingly, we vacate Appellant’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ„ and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw