KEVIN M. STEELE, PETITIONER,
v.
SUSAN B. KINSEY AND UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
KEVIN M. STEELE, PETITIONER,
SUSAN B. KINSEY AND UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
840 So. 2d 1023
Florida Supreme Court (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Steele v. Kinsey, 801 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), a decision of a district court of appeal certifying conflict with the decision of another district court of appeal. Upon reflection and further consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ„ concur. LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc., 908 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2005)…law bad faith. See Isaacson, 244 Cal.Rptr. 655, 750 P. 2d at 300. . The Kinsey court certified a conflict with Johnson. This Court initially accepted the case, but subsequently discharged jurisdiction as improvidently granted. See Steele v. Kinsey, 840 So. 2d 1023 (Fla.2003).…
-
NEW Hampshire Indem. Co. v. Gray, 177 So. 3d 56 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…son. Although the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction, it later decided: “Upon reflection and further consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.” Steele v. Kinsey, 840 So. 2d 1023 (Fla.2003). In an opinion issued two years later, however, the supreme court held that FIGA was bound by the terms of an insolvent insurer’s supplementary payments provisions and, thus, “liable for interest on judgments entered to the same extent a…
Authorities Cited
- Steele v. Kinsey, 801 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)