SALEM LEFILS, APPELLANT,
v.
JILL T. DESMOND, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2003-04-01
No. 5D02-2928
GRIFFIN, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
841 So. 2d 593 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a).

GRIFFIN, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Parrot Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
    …ounsel during the pendency of a case. This burden-shifting proposal is untenable. Regardless, it is well established that “as agent of the client, any notice by or to the attorney in the proceeding is notice to the client.” King-Coleman v. Geathers, 841 So. 2d 593, 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In all matters concerning the prosecution or defense of any proceeding in the court, the attorney of record shall be the agent of the client, and any notice by or to the attorney or act by the attorney in the proceeding sh…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw