BARRY S. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-04-09
No. 3D02-2879
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.
841 So. 2d 657 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Prysi M.D. v. Dep’t of Health, 823 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Pillsbury v. State, Dep’t of Health and Rehab. Servs., 744 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Heifetz v. Dep’t of Bus. Reg., Div. of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 475 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.I.S. v. State, 930 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2006)
    …e negative but certified conflict “[t]o the extent our opinion conflicts with E.R. v. State, 584 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), L.K. v. State, 729 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), J.B. v. State, 829 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and C.C. v. State, 841 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).” J.I.S. v. State, 902 So. 2d 890, 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). We exercise our discretionary ju [*590] risdiction to resolve the certified conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We agree with the First District that on an “in…
  • J.W. v. State, 879 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …offense is properly delineated. J.W. next contends, and the State concedes, that he is entitled to credit for time served in the juvenile detention center. We agree. See J.B. v. State, 829 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). As noted in C.C. v. State, 841 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), credit must be given, as it relates to the misdemeanor offense, so J.W. does not receive a disposition greater than the sentence he could have received as an adult. Two other conditions in the disposition order warrant correcti…
  • J.I.S. v. State, 902 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …affirm for two reasons. We begin by noting that, as a practical matter, since juveniles are committed for indeterminate lengths of time, it is “generally impossible to fix a date from which to deduct time spent in secure detention.” C.C. v. State, 841 So. 2d 657, 658-659 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Consequently, an award of credit for time served in secure detention would have no effect on the length of a juvenile’s commitment, and would be a futile exercise and a waste of judicial resources. Second, we note the…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw