CAROL MEDVEC, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Chambers v. State, 880 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …degree murder. It simply did not charge the lesser-included offense.8 If the rule announced in Ray is intended to apply in nonjury cases, our ruling in Velasquez can be questioned. Similar criticism could be aimed at our opinions in C.R.C. v. State, 842 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and Mauldin v. State, 696 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).9 There is, of course, a significant distinction in trial tactics between a jury trial and a nonjury trial. It is often prudent for a defendant in a jury trial to give the…
• Horne v. State, 846 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
  …ed, encouraged, hired, requested, tried to induce, or solicited his wife or son to have sexual relations. Rather, it stated that Horne engaged in an act with his son that constitutes sexual battery. This was not sufficient. See also C.R.C. v. State, 842 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We note that the Florida Standard Jury Instructions do not appear to contemplate application of either subsection in this factual scenario involving a third party. The blank spaces in the instruction form in which the court is i…