J.J., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
J.J. appeals a delinquency adjudication for aggravated fleeing to elude and leaving the scene of an accident. The court affirms the fleeing conviction but reverses the leaving-the-scene conviction because the trial court convicted J.J. of a nonexistent crime—leaving the scene of a crash without proving any injury, death, or property damage.
The court reversed the leaving-the-scene conviction because there is no Florida statute criminalizing leaving the scene of a crash absent resulting death, injury, or property damage. Conviction of a nonexistent offense constitutes fundamental error and must be reversed.
[1] A delinquency adjudication for aggravated fleeing to elude will be affirmed when the defendant does not challenge that adjudication.
[2] A conviction for leaving the scene of an accident requires proof of injury, death, or damage to a vehicle or property.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It appears that the trial court found J.J. guilty of a nonexistent offense of leaving the scene of an accident. Conviction of a nonexistent crime is fundamental error.”
Establishes the core legal error—conviction under a statutory provision that does not exist
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDuring an adjudicatory hearing, J.J. was charged with leaving the scene of a crash with injury under Florida Statutes section 316.027(1)(a). The State…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Delinquency cases and more on FLexlaw
FULMER, Judge.
J.J. appeals from a delinquency adjudication of guilt for aggravated fleeing to elude and “leaving the scene of an accident.” J.J. does not challenge the delinquency adjudication for aggravated fleeing to elude, and we affirm as to that count. Because the trial court erroneously found J.J. guilty of “leaving the scene of an accident” as a lesser of the charged offense of leaving the scene of a crash with injury, we reverse as to this count.
During the adjudicatory hearing, J.J.’s counsel moved for a dismissal of the charge of leaving the scene of a crash with injury, in violation of section 316.027(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2000), because the State failed to prove injury. The State responded that if injury was not proven, the court could find J.J. guilty of the lesser offense of leaving the scene of a crash, which, the State claimed, was a first-degree misdemeanor. The trial court adopted the State’s suggestion. The order of juvenile probation indicates that J.J. was found guilty of “Leave Scene of Accident.” The order does not cite a statutory reference for this offense.
Pursuant to section 316.027(1), it is a third-degree felony to leave the scene of a crash resulting in injury and a second-degree felony to leave the scene of a crash resulting in death. Pursuant to section 316.061(1), it is a second-degree misdemeanor to leave the scene of a crash resulting in damage to a vehicle or other property. There is no statute that makes it a criminal offense to leave the scene of a crash when there is no resulting death, injury, or damage to a vehicle or other property. The trial court correctly recognized that the State failed to introduce any evidence of injury as required to support a delinquency adjudication under section 316.027(l)(a). Likewise, however, there was no evidence of damage to any vehicles or other property.
It appears that the trial court found J. J. guilty of a nonexistent offense of leaving the scene of an accident. Conviction of a nonexistent crime is fundamental error. Jordan v. State, 801 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Beck v. State, 732 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We therefore reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to strike the offense from the order placing J.J. on probation and to enter a dismissal as to count II of the delinquency petition.1
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., Concur. . Because we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a delinquency adjudication under either section 316.027 or 316.061, we do not decide whether leaving the scene of a crash with property damage is a lesser included offense to a charge of leaving the scene of a crash with death or injury.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Jefferson McCLANE, 891 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…nal limits. The police reports indicates [sic] no damage occurring in the City of Alta-monte Springs and the report incorporates by reference a Maitland Fire De [*598] partment report that places the crash in the City of Maitland. See J.J. v. State, 842 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). (finding a crash did not occur if there was no resulting damage). Because the officer had no jurisdiction to investigate the accident, the hearing officer had no substantial competent evidence upon which to uphold the license sus…
-
Henderson v. State, 952 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…ny of possession of marijuana with intent to sell within 1000 feet of a public housing facility must be reversed because at the time Henderson committed the act, the statute did not identify such conduct as a second-degree felony. See J.J. v. State, 842 So. 2d 266, 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“Conviction of a nonexistent crime is fundamental error.”). However, we do not agree that Henderson should be discharged. The information sufficiently alleged the lesser-included offense of possession of marijuana with inte…
Authorities Cited
- Jordan v. State, 801 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Hill v. State, 732 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)