HAROLD WAYNE BLACKWELL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So. 3d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …have focused on the “at any time” language in the statutory text, finding that the trial court should have held an evidentiary hearing to allow the movant to present evidence regarding the initial procurement of the injunction. See York v. McCarron, 842 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Madan v. Madan, 729 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Here, the court gave no reasons for its summary denial. Even assuming that appellant was required to allege a change in circumstances in order to state a legally sufficient mo…
• Reyes v. Reyes, 104 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)
  …have focused on the “at any time” language in the statutory text, finding that the trial court should have held an evidentiary hearing to allow the movant to present evidence regarding the initial procurement of the injunction. See York v. McCarron, 842 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Madan v. Madan, 729 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Id. at 239. See also Betterman v. Kukelhan, 977 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). We hold that, for a movant to be entitled to obtain relief on a motion to modify or dissolve a d…
• Goodwin v. Whitley, 103 So. 3d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …e Ms. Whitley, to testify, or to present argument to the court. This was a denial of due process. See, e.g., Ramirez v. Teutsch, — So. 3d -, 2012 WL 1759382 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Kugler v. Joosten, 58 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); York v. McCarron, 842 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); McFarr v. McKee, 83 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Raymonvil v. Lewis, 46 So. 3d 139 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So. 3d 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). We REVERSE and REMAND with directions to the lower court to co…

Authorities Cited

• LEE v. State, 770 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
• Mannie Wilfredo Perez v. State, 479 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)