JOHN EARL HUBBARD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JOHN EARL HUBBARD, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
842 So. 2d 782
Florida Supreme Court (2003)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted review of Hubbard v. State, 773 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, and in light of our recent decision in Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla.2002), we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.
Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (24 total)
-
State v. McCORMICK, 868 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 2004)…al a decision of a district court of appeal declaring invalid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla.2003), we summarily affirm the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in McCormick v. State, 826 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). It is so ordered. ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.…
-
Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004)…A review of our jurisprudence reveals that we have defined a “proper” connection in various ways. We have described a proper connection as one that is “natural or logical.” See, e.g., Florida Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So. 2d 782, 785 (Fla.2003) (“[M]atters included in the act [must] have a natural or logical connection.”); Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655, 657 (Fla.2000) (“Pursuant to [the single subject] requirement, there must be a logical or natural connection between the…
-
Lescher v. Fla. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 985 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2008)…Legislature amended this provision by eliminating the eligibility for hardship licenses for drivers with four DUI convictions. See 322.271(4), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1998). However, in Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Critchfield, 842 So. 2d 782 (Fla.2003), we held invalid the session law containing the amendment because of a single-subject violation. In effect, our holding revived the pre-1998 law permitting hardship licenses. Shortly after our decision in Critchfield, however, the Legisla…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2002)
- Hubbard v. State, 773 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)