MARK LEE DACOSTA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARK LEE DACOSTA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
842 So. 2d 935
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief, without prejudice to appellant presenting his gain-time challenge to the Department of Corrections. If appellant is not satisfied with the Department of Correction’s ruling, then he can file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Taylor v. State, 780 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Black v. State, 771 So. 2d 1281, 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
FARMER, KLEIN, and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bethel v. State, 850 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…sent his gain-time challenge to the Department of Corrections first. If he is not satisfied after exhaustion of administrative remedies there, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Dacosta v. State, 842 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). KLEIN, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.…
-
Dacosta v. State, 876 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. DaCosta v. State, 842 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Taylor v. State, 780 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)