SHERRY F. ROMANO, APPELLANT,

v.

EASTERN FINANCIAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …judge in this case participated in negotiations or whether the judge was merely aware of negotiations that had occurred between counsel. . We are uncertain whether our decision conflicts with the Third District's recent decision in Smith v. State, 842 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). That decision involves a recent sentencing hearing, and the motion may have been filed pursuant to rule 3.800(b).…
• Lacce Wright v. State, 891 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …ve sentencing which had been brought under Rule 3.800(a). There is no indication that any procedural objection was raised to the use of Rule 3.800(a) in that case, and the procedural issue was not discussed in the Ortiz opinion. In Smith v. State, 842 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), this court issued an opinion which granted relief on a vindictive sentencing claim which had been brought under Rule 3.800(a). Again, there is no indication that any procedural objection was raised to the use of Rule 3.800(a) in…
• Snow v. Crosby, 851 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Richardson v. State, 809 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Graff v. State, 843 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Compare Wilson, 845 So. 2d at 158; Nairn v. State, 837 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Cf. also Smith v. State, 842 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(plea offer made by trial court itself). Because therefore, the claim of vindictive sentencing has no merit, appellate counsel could not have been ineffective by failing to raise it.2,3 Habeas Corpus denied. . The court went on t…

Authorities Cited

• Cordette Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Fla., Inc., 829 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2002)