TEOFILO C. ROBLERO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant pled guilty to DUI manslaughter and other related charges and, one week after he was sentenced, filed a pro se motion to withdraw his plea alleging that his lawyer intimidated him and misinformed him. At the hearing appellant was unrepresented and his counsel testified against him. He appeals the order denying the motion to withdraw his plea, arguing that he was entitled to be represented by conflict-free counsel at the hearing on the motion to withdraw. The state concedes that appellant was entitled to counsel, Padgett v. State, 743 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We disagree with the state’s assertion that the lack of representation could be harmless under these facts. Reversed.
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lander v. Smith, 906 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…a putative father has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the married woman and her husband object.” Johnson v. Ruby, 771 So. 2d 1275, 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Tijerino v. Estrella, 843 So. 2d 984, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Bellomo v. Gagliano, 815 So. 2d 721, 722 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(“The court expressly held that section 742.011 does not extend to permit the alleged biological father of a child born of an intact marriage to sue for a determina…
-
Treneka Simmonds v. Connor Perkins, 247 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 2018)…with a decision of this Court and decisions of other district courts on a question of law. We agree with Simmonds that Perkins expressly and directly conflicts with Slowinski v. Sweeney , 64 So. 3d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), and Tijerino v. Estrella , 843 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), on the question of whether a biological father is entitled to rebut the common law presumption that the mother's husband is the legal father of a child born to an intact marriage, where the mother or her husband object to allowin…1 / 2
-
Nevitt v. Bonomo, 53 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…father “has no right to seek to establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage when the [*1082] married woman and her husband object.” Johnson v. Ruby, 771 So. 2d 1275, 1275-76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Tijerino v. Estrella, 843 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); S.D. v. AG., 764 So. 2d 807, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); S.B. v. D.H., 736 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); I.A. v. H.H., 710 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); G.F.C., 686 So. 2d at 1386. An intact marriage has been described as “the exis…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Padgett v. State, 743 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)