BRY-CO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ST. ANDREWS BAY COMMUNITY HOTEL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment against Bry-co Development Company, agreeing to control the decision by a prior, identically-situated case to save labor and expense.
Yes, the judgment in this case is controlled by the prior case's judgment, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
“That in order t'o save labor and expense that no transcript of the record be made in the above styled cause, but that the clerk of. this court send to the Supreme Court a certified copy of the writ of error sued out in this case and a certified copy of this stipulation and that' the judgment to be entered in this case in the Supreme Court be controlled by and be the same as the judgment of the Supreme .Court in the Bryan case and that this case be in all respect's controlled by decision and judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case.”
This quote from the stipulation highlights the parties' agreement to have this case's outcome dictated by a prior, similar case to save costs.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBry-co Development Company appealed a judgment against it in favor of St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation. The parties submitted a stipulation…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stipulation Of Parties cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
In this cause a writ of error was taken to a judgment rendered in Bay County.-in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error. The parties have filed in this Court a stipulation wherein it is agreed that the question involved in this case is identically the same as in the case of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, a corporation, brought by writ of error to this Court and
“That in order t'o save labor and expense that no transcript of the record be made in the above styled cause, but that the clerk of. this court send to the Supreme Court a certified copy of the writ of error sued out in this case and a certified copy of this stipulation and that' the judgment to be entered in this case in the Supreme Court be controlled by and be the same as the judgment of the Supreme .Court in the Bryan case and that this case be in all respect's controlled by decision and judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case.”
This Court has this day affirmed the judgment rendered in the case of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, and pursuant t'o said agreement, we now affirm the judgment in this case.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.