J. B. MCCALL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ST. ANDREWS BAY COMMUNITY HOTEL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment based on a stipulation between the parties. The stipulation agreed that the current case presented the same legal question as a prior, decided case, and that the judgment in this case should be controlled by the decision in the prior case.
Yes, the judgment should be affirmed. The court followed the parties' stipulation to control the outcome of this case based on the prior decision.
“That in order to save labor and expense that no transcript of the record be made in the above styled cause, but that the clerk of this court send to the Supreme Court a certified copy of the writ of error sued out in this ease and a certified copy of this stipulation and that the judgment to be entered in this case in the Supreme Court be controlled by and be the same as the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case and that this ease be in all respects controlled by the decision and judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan ease.”
This quote details the stipulation agreement between the parties, which dictated the court's decision-making process.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff in error (appellant) sought review of a judgment entered against him in favor of the defendant in error (appellee). The parties filed a …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stipulation Of Parties cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
In this cause a writ of error was taken to a judgment rendered in Bay County in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error. The parties have filed in this Court a stipulation wherein it is agreed that the question involved in this case is identically the same as in the case of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, a corporation, brought by writ of error to this Court and
“That in order to save labor and expense that no transcript of the record be made in the above styled cause, but that the clerk of this court send to the Supreme Court a certified copy of the writ of error sued out in this ease and a certified copy of this stipulation and that the judgment to be entered in this case in the Supreme Court be controlled by and be the same as the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case and that this ease be in all respects controlled by the decision and judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan ease.”
This Court has this day affirmed the judgment rendered in the case of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, and pursuant to said agreement, we now affirm the judgment in this ease.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.