J. ED STOKES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ST. ANDREWS BAY COMMUNITY HOTEL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment based on a stipulation between the parties. This stipulation agreed that the case's issue was identical to a previously decided case, and the outcome should mirror that prior decision to save time and expense.
Yes, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed because the parties stipulated that the issue and desired outcome were identical to a previously decided case, Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation.
“In this cause a writ of error was taken to a judgment rendered in Bay County in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error.”
Describes the procedural posture of the case.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff in error (Stokes) appealed a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in error (St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation). The par…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stipulation Of Parties cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
In this cause a writ of error was taken to a judgment rendered in Bay County in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error. The parties have filed in this Court a stipulation wherein it is agreed that the question involved in this case is identically the same as in the ease of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, a corporation, brought by writ of error to this Court and
“That in order to save labor and expense that no transcript of the record be made in the above styled cause, but that the clerk of this court' send to the Supreme Court a certified copy of the writ of error sued out in this case and a certified copy of this stipu lation and that the judgment to be entered in this ease in the Supreme Court be controlled by and be the same as the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case and that this case be in all respects controlled by the decision and judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bryan case.”
This Court has this day affirmed the judgment rendered in the case of C. J. Bryan v. St. Andrews Bay Community Hotel Corporation, and pursuant, to said agreement, we now affirm the judgment in this case. .
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur..