THOMAS EMMANUEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS EMMANUEL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
844 So. 2d 807
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s, Thomas Emmanuel, conviction on the charge of impregnating a child under the age of sixteen; however, we remand for resentencing. Appellee concedes, and we agree, appellant must be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines rather than the 1995 sentencing guidelines with a corrected sc.oresheet as argued by appellee.
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Middleton v. State, 95 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 890 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 879 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (table) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 844 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (affirming without prejudice denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 806 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (table) (denying petition for writ of habeas); 798 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (table) (affirming denial of Rule 3.…