MONTE D. MOORE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Winder v. Dian A. Winder, 152 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …s, including, but not limited to, the factors listed within section 61.08(2)(a)-(j). See § 61.08(2), Fla. Stat. (2011). “The purpose of permanent periodic alimony is not to divide future income to establish financial equality.” Rosecan v. Springer, 845 So. 2d 927, 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). In this case, there is no presumption for or against permanent alimony, as the parties’ 10-year marriage was a “grey-area” marriage. See Sellers v. Sellers, 68 So. 3d 348, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (noting that marriages of l…
• Donoff v. Mitzi Robin Donoff, 940 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …ial court should increase the amount of alimony by adding an investment (i.e., growth) allowance, disapproving of the holding to that effect in Messina v. Messina, 676 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). 771 So. 2d at 1141; see also Rosecan v. Springer, 845 So. 2d 927, 930 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that Mallard bars a court from using alimony to “forge economic equality, without regard to the needs of the recipient spouse”); Pietras v. Pietras, 842 So. 2d 956, 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that alimony may…
• Lakin v. Lakin, 901 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …uring the marriage of the parties. In determining whether to award permanent periodic alimony, the court must consider the needs of the spouse requesting the alimony and the ability of the other spouse to make alimony payments.” Rosecan v. Springer, 845 So. 2d 927, 928 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting Zeigler v. Zeigler, 635 So. 2d 50, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)) (citations omitted). Section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes (2003), sets forth the factors a trial court must consider when considering an alimony award. These…

Authorities Cited

• Jones v. State, 845 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 2003)
• Young v. State, 645 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1994)