EX PARTE A. A. CROSBY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment, remanding the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The Court found no new questions presented in the record beyond those already decided.
No, the Court found that all questions presented in the record had already been addressed and disposed of by the Court.
“and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its' judgment to be given in the premises, and it appearing unto the Court that there are no questions presented by the' record herein other than those already disposed of by the Court”
Establishes the court's finding that no new issues were presented.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case was submitted to the Florida Supreme Court on a transcript of the record, briefs, and arguments. The Court reviewed the record and the argume…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
[*241] Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record in the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its' judgment to be given in the premises, and it appearing unto the Court that there are no questions presented by the' record herein other than those already disposed of by the Court; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court of Charlotte County, Florida, for such other and further proceedings therein as may be consistent with the opinion and order of the Court herein entered, and that mandate do issue forthwith.
Whiteield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Bueord, J.' J.,' concur.